One of the most frequent questions that I get, as an experienced Minnesota Criminal Defense Attorney, from clients is “the cops never read me my rights ... does that matter?” If you were in custody and were interrogated, then yes, it does.
Never Read My Rights (Think of it this way) 
Were you in custody? 
Generally, the courts have look to the following factors to determine whether someone is in in custody: police interviewing a suspect at a police station; the 
presence of multiple police officers; telling someone they are the prime
 suspect; restraining the person’s freedom; and pointing a gun at 
someone.  Courts have identified the following factors as someone not in 
custody: questioning at a person’s home; a suspect’s ability to leave at
 any time; a nonthreatening environment; police informing someone they 
are not under arrest; and the brevity of questioning.  While not one of the above factors alone will be determinative. 
Instead, the court will use a totality of the circumstances approach to 
determine whether someone is in custody. 
Were you interrogated?
A suspect may make a voluntary statement to the police or confess to a
 crime without any questioning at all. These statements may be admitted 
into evidence without a Miranda warning taking place, because no 
interrogation took place. But even if the police do not ask any specific
 questions, they may still not be coercive in their actions or words. 
The “the term ‘interrogation’ under Miranda refers not only to
 express questioning, but also to any words or actions on the part of 
the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody) 
that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an 
incriminating response from the suspect.”
In Minnesota, the rule isL “an interrogation is custodial if, based on all the 
surrounding circumstances, ‘a reasonable person under the circumstances 
would believe that he or she was in police custody of the degree 
associated with formal arrest.’”
What's Going to Happen?
Many arrests take place without Miranda ever being read to the 
accused. For example, in DWI cases, officers are generally only required
 to read someone their Miranda rights after they decide whether they are
 going to take an evidentiary test. Further, many traffic stops and 
offenses never trigger Miranda warnings. Thank Hollywood for the 
idea that officers are required to read Miranda for every arrest. 
Sadly, the remedy for a Miranda violation also often does not result in a 
dismissal, rather the remedy for a Miranda violation is the suppression 
of statements made after the violation and often evidence obtained 
because of those statements. So even if you were in custody and were 
being interrogated, and the cops did not read you your Miranda rights, 
then the prosecution may still move forward with its case if it has 
enough other evidence against you.
Still have questions - please feel free to Call The Rolloff Law Office --- for FREE ANSWERS: (612) 234-1165 


Thanks for sharing this informative information with us. I found your article to be very helpful with the tips provided. Have a great rest of your day.
ReplyDeleteDUI Lawyer Philadelphia